A Quick Utility Module
Onorio Catenacci
Posted on April 30, 2024
I was working on some code with a friend of mine and we came up with what seems a relatively clever way to do a couple of validations. I'm putting this post here to share this in case it benefits anyone else:
defmodule Validations do
@moduledoc """
This module contains a few validation predicate functions.
"""
@doc """
Checks if a string contains only specified characters. The specified characters are passed in a list. The list can be one or more characters. You could pass an empty list if you wished but that would always return false.
## Examples
iex> Validations.string_contains_only_specified_chars?("abc", ["a", "b", "c"])
true
iex> Validations.string_contains_only_specified_chars?("abr", ["a", "b", "c"])
false
"""
@spec string_contains_only_specified_chars?(String.t(), [String.t(), ...]) :: boolean
def string_contains_only_specified_chars?(string, list)
when is_binary(string) and is_list(list) do
string
|> String.graphemes()
|> Enum.reduce(true, fn letter, acc -> letter in list && acc end)
end
@doc """
Checks if a string is of a specified length or not.
## Examples
iex> Validations.string_expected_length?("abc", 3)
true
iex> Validations.string_expected_length?("abc", 2)
false
"""
@spec string_expected_length?(String.t(), integer) :: boolean
def string_expected_length?(string, length) when is_binary(string) and is_integer(length) do
String.length(string) == length
end
end
Nothing innovative or surprising--just a little something I whipped up that I wanted to share for the potential benefit of others.
💖 💪 🙅 🚩
Onorio Catenacci
Posted on April 30, 2024
Join Our Newsletter. No Spam, Only the good stuff.
Sign up to receive the latest update from our blog.