Optimizing costs in GitHub Actions

juancrg90

Juan C. Ruiz

Posted on May 31, 2020

Optimizing costs in GitHub Actions

Recently in EasyBroker we decided to migrate our continuous integration system to GitHub Actions.

Our first setup was a workflow with 12 containers considering a good idea to quickly identify errors in our tests.

Optimizing%20costs%20in%20GitHub%20Actions%207b464c031286482f9b1db7b6d9b72442/Untitled.png

The average time per container was about 6 minutes, while only 2 containers in specific (models and a group of controllers) took about 12 minutes.

Optimizing%20costs%20in%20GitHub%20Actions%207b464c031286482f9b1db7b6d9b72442/Untitled%201.png

Optimizing%20costs%20in%20GitHub%20Actions%207b464c031286482f9b1db7b6d9b72442/Untitled%202.png

After a week working with this new implementation, we received a message from GitHub warning us about we were near to consume all the minutes of the free tier that they provides ๐Ÿ’ธ๐Ÿ’ธ๐Ÿ’ธ, so we decided to investigate.

First of all, we noticed the 10 containers that took 6 minutes to complete the task, 4 minutes were for setup.

Optimizing%20costs%20in%20GitHub%20Actions%207b464c031286482f9b1db7b6d9b72442/Untitled%203.png

Later we found despite we had the cache "configured", our container was downloading the gems over and over again.

Optimizing%20costs%20in%20GitHub%20Actions%207b464c031286482f9b1db7b6d9b72442/Untitled%204.png

And finally, the tests were taken only between 20 and 50 seconds of the process.

Optimizing%20costs%20in%20GitHub%20Actions%207b464c031286482f9b1db7b6d9b72442/Untitled%205.png

Optimizing%20costs%20in%20GitHub%20Actions%207b464c031286482f9b1db7b6d9b72442/Untitled%206.png

Saving some minutes

The first change that we did was going from 12 containers to 2. Considering the agent controller tests takes most of the time, we decided to merge the models container with the other 10 containers that were taken between 20 and 50 seconds to complete the tests, ending with a configuration like the following.

Before

strategy:
      fail-fast: false
      matrix:
        test_folder: [models, helpers, jobs, lib, mailers, presenters, services, controllers/*.rb, controllers/admin, controllers/agent, controllers/webhooks, controllers/api]
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Now

strategy:
      fail-fast: false
      matrix:
        test_folder: [models helpers test/jobs test/lib test/mailers test/presenters test/services test/controllers/*.rb test/controllers/admin test/controllers/webhooks testcontrollers/api, controllers/agent]   

Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

The next change was updating the cache setup to make it work, our configuration was using the version 1 of actions/cache and we were including the restore-keys option, the documentation mentions that this input is optional.

- name: Gem cache
        uses: actions/cache@v1
        with:
          path: vendor/bundle
          key: ${{ runner.os }}-gems-${{ hashFiles('**/Gemfile.lock') }}
          restore-keys: |
            ${{ runner.os }}-gems-
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

So I updated to version 2 of the action and I removed the restore-keys input considering is not necessary at this moment.

- name: Gem cache
        uses: actions/cache@v2
        with:
          path: vendor/bundle
          key: ${{ runner.os }}-gem-use-ruby-${{ hashFiles('**/Gemfile.lock') }}
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

In addition to that, reviewing the step where the dependencies are installed, I found that we had it merged with the step to create the database and it showed us a deprecation warning when executing bundle install with the flag to indicate the installation path of the gems.

- name: Bundle Install and Create DB
        env:
          RAILS_ENV: test
          DB_PASSWORD: root
          DB_PORT: ${{ job.services.mysql.ports[3306] }}
        run: |
          sudo /etc/init.d/mysql start
          cp config/database.ci.yml config/database.yml
          gem install bundler --version 2.0.2 --no-ri --no-rdoc
          bundle install --jobs 4 --retry 3 --path vendor/bundle
          bin/rails db:setup
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode
[DEPRECATED] The `--path` flag is deprecated because it relies on being remembered across bundler invocations, which bundler will no longer do in future versions. Instead please use `bundle config set path 'vendor/bundle'`, and stop using this flag
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

So I opted to separate it into 2 separate steps and update the way the bundler detects the location of the gems.

- name: Bundle install
        run: |
          gem install bundler --version 2.0.2 --no-ri --no-rdoc
          bundle config path vendor/bundle
          bundle install --jobs 4 --retry 3
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode
- name: Create DB
        env:
          RAILS_ENV: test
          DB_PASSWORD: root
          DB_PORT: ${{ job.services.mysql.ports[3306] }}
        run: |
          sudo /etc/init.d/mysql start
          cp config/database.ci.yml config/database.yml
          bin/rails db:setup
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

With these little tweaks we were able to pass from 4 minutes installing the gems in just 4 seconds.

Before

Optimizing%20costs%20in%20GitHub%20Actions%207b464c031286482f9b1db7b6d9b72442/Untitled%207.png

Now

Optimizing%20costs%20in%20GitHub%20Actions%207b464c031286482f9b1db7b6d9b72442/Untitled%208.png

As a final step for this first stage of optimization, I took a look at the steps where we did the installation of some dependencies using apt-get and I found that some calls were unnecessary. For example, when we verified the MySQL connection, we were trying to install the client that is already installed in the container and this took about 20 seconds (between verify the installation and perform the connection test). Removing this unnecessary apt-get call we were able to down the time to 6 seconds.

Before

Optimizing%20costs%20in%20GitHub%20Actions%207b464c031286482f9b1db7b6d9b72442/Untitled%209.png

Now

Optimizing%20costs%20in%20GitHub%20Actions%207b464c031286482f9b1db7b6d9b72442/Untitled%2010.png

Takeaways

This was the first stage of our update to have a healthy and efficient CI system, after apply these changes we were able to reduce from about 1 hour and 30 minutes per execution.

Optimizing%20costs%20in%20GitHub%20Actions%207b464c031286482f9b1db7b6d9b72442/Untitled%2011.png

To only about 20 minutes.

Optimizing%20costs%20in%20GitHub%20Actions%207b464c031286482f9b1db7b6d9b72442/Untitled%2012.png

The experience of this is, in services where the billing depends on the execution time, saving seconds is crucial, and it is important to pay attention to the little details. Like the apt-get dependency installation scenario where the dependencies are already installed in the container. Maybe 13 seconds sounds as nothing relevant, but if you consider the number of builds that you have in your company every day probably you can save 1 or two hours per day and this will be reflected in your billing.

The next step is to try to move the dependencies that require to be installed manually into a Docker container (I still need to investigate if this is possible) and use a tool like TestProf to identify the slowest tests and try to optimize them.

๐Ÿ’– ๐Ÿ’ช ๐Ÿ™… ๐Ÿšฉ
juancrg90
Juan C. Ruiz

Posted on May 31, 2020

Join Our Newsletter. No Spam, Only the good stuff.

Sign up to receive the latest update from our blog.

Related

ยฉ TheLazy.dev

About