Cleaning Up Redux Store Listeners When Component State Updates

alexmacarthur

Alex MacArthur

Posted on March 31, 2020

Cleaning Up Redux Store Listeners When Component State Updates

I’m writing a Gutenberg block for TypeIt that’ll allow content creators to easily drop typewriter effects into WordPress. The Gutenberg infrastructure is heavily rooted in the React ecosystem, so building a block feels very much like building a React application.

One piece of this ecosystem that’s new to me, however, is Redux, and soon after I dove into it, I ran into a problem that had my head tilting for quite some time — enough time to warrant writing it down in case I ever need to explain it to myself again.

The Problem

The short version is that I seemingly couldn’t update local state inside a Redux store listener housed within that component. And in my particular setup, an infinite loop was resulting. I was dumbfounded.

The Context

In my code, I have a global Redux store that’s responsible for holding the base options for each TypeIt block on a page (why they’re managed separately like this is another conversation). Whenever a block is saved, I want to pull down that block’s options from the shared store and save them with the block itself, rather than storing them somewhere else altogether. Here is my professional artistic attempt to illustrate this arrangement:

I attempted to solve this by updating local block state whenever my global store changed. To pull it off, in my block’s component, I used Redux’s subscribe method to listen for any global store changes. When they occurred, I checked if the options for my specific block have changed, and if they did, I updated my block’s attributes (the prop used in a Gutenberg block to save and manage block data).

That looked something like this (a bit stripped down for brevity):

const { useEffect } = wp.element;
const { subscribe } = wp.data;

registerBlockType('wp-typeit/block', {
  // ...
  edit: ({ attributes, setAttributes }) => {
    // ... 
    useEffect(() => {
      subscribe(() => {
        let baseSettings = wp.data.select('wp-typeit/store').getSettings()[instanceId]

        if (JSON.stringify(baseSettings) !== JSON.stringify(attributes.settings)) {
          setAttributes({ settings: baseSettings });
        }
      }
    }, []); // <-- Only set up listener on `mount`.
  }
}

This looked pretty safe. But when a global store change occurred, an infinite loop was set off within the component. I soon realized that the setAttributes method provided by Gutenberg triggered another store change (I don’t yet know why). Unexpected, but it still shouldn’t be a problem. After all, the next time the listener fires, my global settings should exactly match my local attributes, preventing the setAttributes method from being called again.

But that was apparently incorrect. As it turned out, within that subscribe listener, my local state wasnt’t getting updated at all. And so every time the listener fired, that equality check would fail every time, over and over again. Infinite loop.

Remember, This Is React

It took a bit, but the solution to this problem arose after remembering how React handles updates to its state. Every time a component’s state (including props) is changed, that component is re-rendered, and it’s only after that rerender when the updated state (including props) is available.

But my subscribe listener wasn’t respecting that. It was being activated once after the component mounted, and so it was only aware of the version of the props it had at that specific time. I could call setAttributes all I wanted, but that specific listener instance would behave as if nothing happened at all.

useEffect(() => {
  subscribe(() => {
    // Listener is created ONCE, and never aware of future state updates.
  }
}, []);

The Solution: Clean Up Store Listeners

In order to perform future store comparisons after my local state was updated, I needed to throw away my subscribe listener every time a local state change occurred. With my specific circumstances, that meant a few tweaks:

  1. Extract the unsubscribe method returned when a subscribe listener is created.
  2. Unsubscribe immediately before the setAttributes method fires. Since setAttributes triggers a global store change, this unplugs the listener to prevent it from firing before the local state is technically updated.
  3. Instead of setting up a single listener on mount, do so every time the block is updated. To avoid listeners becoming stacked upon listeners, I’m using the cleanup mechanism built into the useEffect hook by returning from the hook with an unsubscribe() method call. Even though I’m already unsubscribing every time I call setAttributes, this will cover my butt any time a different state change occurs, totally unrelated to these settings. The objective is to never have more than one store listener active in the component at once, and this helps guarantee that.

In all, those changes look like this:

const { useEffect } = wp.element;
const { subscribe } = wp.data;

registerBlockType('wp-typeit/block', {
  // ...
  edit: ({ attributes, setAttributes}) => {
    useEffect(() => {
      // ...
- subscribe(() => {
+ const unsubscribe = subscribe(() => {
        let baseSettings = wp.data.select('wp-typeit/store').getSettings()[instanceId]

        if (JSON.stringify(baseSettings) !== JSON.stringify(attributes.settings)) {
+ unsubscribe();
          setAttributes({ settings: baseSettings });
        }
      }

+ return () => {
+ unsubscribe(); <!-- Destroy listener after every state change.
+ }
- }, []);
+ }); // <!-- Activate new listener after every state change.
  }
}

Takeaway: Understand the React Lifecycle

While this particular problem is highly specific to WordPress/Gutenberg, it all illustrates how important it is to have a solid understanding of the React lifecycle and the gotchas that it makes possible by nature. In fact, it’s probably a good practice to start troubleshooting bugs like this by rubber ducking the events leading up to and following the undesired behavior that’s occurring. If it’s anything like the challege I’ve shared here, you’ll walk away with a better understanding of how React fundamentally works, as well as confirmation that you’re not actually going insane.

                (This is an article published at macarthur.me. [Read it online here](https://macarthur.me/posts/cleaning-up-redux-store-listeners-when-component-state-updates).)
💖 💪 🙅 🚩
alexmacarthur
Alex MacArthur

Posted on March 31, 2020

Join Our Newsletter. No Spam, Only the good stuff.

Sign up to receive the latest update from our blog.

Related