Taq Karim
Posted on January 3, 2021
TL;DR: use $(eval ARGS=${ARGS} [some additional arg])
within a make target to build custom argument sequences for commands wrapped by make targets - like make test
I expound further on the usecase and methodology below 👇
I like to wrap common tasks, such as running unit tests, around a make target.
This way, I can minimize the length of the command I need to run (ie: make test
vs go test ./... -race -coverprofile=c.out
)
However, as a project grows, it becomes necessary or just preferable to support a variety of permutations of the above.
(Note: I am not advocating that one ought to use make targets in this manner, just that if this route is chosen, there are patterns available to simplify things a bit).
For the sake of go, here are a few potential tests I'd like to be able to run:
Run tests w/race conditions check
go test ./... -race
Run tests in "short" mode
go test ./... -short
Run tests w/verbose results in terminal
go test ./... -v
Run tests for a specific package
go test ./my_awesome_pkg/...
Run a specific test func in a specific package
go test ./my_awesome_pkg/... -r=TestFoobar
A better way
Of course, the main issue that comes up here is: what if we wanted to mix and match some of these opts? (For instance, we might want to run tests on a specific package with verbose test output with race condition checks enabled.)
Again, assuming we'd like to reuse the make test
interface, our make target can get really messy really quickly:
# Usage:
# make test-dev
# make test-dev package=my_awesome_pkg
test:
ifdef package
go test -v ./${package}/... -coverprofile=c.out
else
go test ./... -coverprofile=c.out
endif
In this example, we only support two use cases, run all tests in a single package and run all tests in all packages in current working directory. Even so, as you can probably see, it is easy to miss stuff (for instance, package tests have the verbose flag) and repetition can start to seep in (note the -coverprofile arg in both conditions).
An alternative (and personally, preferable approach might be):
# Usage:
# make test norace=1
# Expl: run WITHOUT race conditions
# make test ftest=1
# Explt: run WITH "ftests", long lived non unit tests
# make test v=1
# Explt: run in verbose mode
# make test package=my_awesome_pkg
# Explt: run tests in a single package only
# NOTE: if omitted, will run ALL tests
# make test package=my_awesome_pkg func=TestViews
# Explt: run a single test func (needs package as well)
test:
$(eval ARGS=)
# by default, run with race conditions
ifndef norace
$(eval ARGS=${ARGS} -race)
endif
# by default, run in "short" mode
ifndef ftest
$(eval ARGS=${ARGS} -short)
endif
ifdef v
$(eval ARGS=${ARGS} -v)
endif
# if package provided, run the package
ifdef package
$(eval ARGS=${ARGS} ./${package}/...)
else
$(eval ARGS=${ARGS} ./...)
endif
# if func provided, run the func only
ifdef func
$(eval ARGS=${ARGS} -run=${func})
endif
go test ${ARGS} -coverprofile=c.out
In this approach, we use $(eval ARGS=${ARGS} [append an arg]
to build the actual args for our go test
invocation based on make target args.
What's nice about this approach is we can choose to make certain things default vs non default by leveraging make's ifdef
and ifndef
(if not defined) conditionals.
The last line is the actual test invocation and if we wanted to, we could always echo ${ARGS}
right before for debugging purposes, etc.
I really like this approach and have started using it in a lot of my makefile target patterns where I leverage make test
for dev-ing or ci related tasks. While I've walked through a golang based usecase, this pattern can be used for more or less any make target usage (though personally, I really only use this for running tests during dev/ci).
Posted on January 3, 2021
Join Our Newsletter. No Spam, Only the good stuff.
Sign up to receive the latest update from our blog.