Input components with the useState and useEffect hooks in React
Matthew Daly
Posted on October 28, 2019
Like many developers who use React.js, I’ve been eager to explore the Hooks API in the last year or so. They allow for easier ways to share functionality between components, and can allow for a more expressive syntax that’s a better fit for Javascript than class-based components. Unfortunately, they became production ready around the time I rolled out a new React-based home page, so I didn’t want to jump on them immediately in the context of a legacy application. I’m now finding myself with a bit of breathing space, so I’ve begun refactoring these components, and converting some to use hooks, in order to more easily reuse some code that currently resides in a big higher-order component.
The useState
and useEffect
hooks are by far the most common hooks in most applications. However, I’ve found that the React documentation, while OK at explaining how to use these individually, is not so good at explaining how to use them together, particularly in the case of an input component, which is a common use case when looking to convert existing components. For that reason, I’m going to provide a short example of how you might use them together for that use case.
A simple function component
A basic component for an input might look like this:
//@flow
import React from 'react';
type Props = {
name: string,
id: string,
value: string,
placeholder: string
};
const Input = (props: Props) => {
return (
<input type="text" name={props.name} id={props.id} value={props.value} placeholder={props.placeholder} />
);
}
export default Input;
Note I’m using Flow annotations to type the arguments passed to my components. If you prefer Typescript it should be straightforward to convert to that.
As you can see, this component accepts a name, ID, value and placeholder as props. If you add this to an existing React app, or use create-react-app
to create one and add this to it, you can include it in another component as follows:
<Input name="foo" id="foo" value="foo" placeholder="foo" />
Adding state
This will render, but as the value will never change it’s not actually of any use in a form. If you’ve written class-based React components before, you’ll know that the usual way to handle this is to move the value of the input from props to state. Prior to the introduction of the Hooks API, while you could create a function component, you couldn’t use state with it, making situations like this difficult to handle. Fortunately, the useState
hook now allows you to add state to a function component as follows:
//@flow
import React, { useState } from 'react';
type Props = {
name: string,
id: string,
value: string,
placeholder: string
};
const Input = (props: Props) => {
const [value, setValue] = useState(props.value);
return (
<input type="text" name={props.name} id={props.id} value={value} placeholder={props.placeholder} onChange={(e) => setValue(e.target.value)} />
);
}
export default Input;
We import the useState
hook at the top, as usual. Then, within the body of the component, we call useState()
, passing in the initial value of props.value
, and get back two variables in response:
-
value
is the value of the state variable, and can be thought of as equivalent to whatthis.state.value
would be in a class-based component -
setValue
is a function for updatingvalue
- rather than explicitly defining a function for this, we can just get one back fromuseState()
Now we can set the value with value={value}
. We also need to handle changes in the state, so we add onChange={(e) => setValue(e.target.value)}
to call setValue()
on a change event on the input.
Handling effects
The component will now allow you to edit the value. However, one problem remains. If you open the React dev tools, go to the props for this component, and set value
manually, it won’t be reflected in the input’s value, because the state has diverged from the initial value passed in as a prop. We need to be able to pick up on changes in the props and pass them through as state.
In class-based components, there are lifecycle methods that fire at certain times, such as componentDidMount()
and componentDidUpdate()
, and we would use those to handle that situation. Hooks condense these into a single useEffect
hook that is more widely useful. Here’s how we might overcome this problem in our component:
//@flow
import React, { useState, useEffect } from 'react';
type Props = {
name: string,
id: string,
value: string,
placeholder: string
};
const Input = (props: Props) => {
const [value, setValue] = useState(props.value);
useEffect(() => {
setValue(props.value);
}, [props.value]);
return (
<input type="text" name={props.name} id={props.id} value={value} placeholder={props.placeholder} onChange={(e) => setValue(e.target.value)}/>
);
}
export default Input;
useEffect
takes one compulsory argument, in the form of a callback. Here we’re using that callback to set our state variable back to the value of the prop passed through.
Note the second argument, which is an array of variables that should be watched for changes. If we had used the following code instead:
useEffect(() => {
setValue(props.value);
});
Then the callback would fire after every render, reverting the value back and possibly causing an infinite loop. For that reason, we pass through the second argument, which tells React to only fire the callback if one of the specified variables has changed. Here we only want to override the state when the value props passed down to the component changes, so we pass that prop in as an argument.
Summary
This is only a simple example, but it does show how simple and expressive hooks can make your React components, and how to use the useEffect
and useState
hooks together, which was something I found the documentation didn’t make clear. These two hooks cover a large chunk of the functionality of React, and knowledge of them is essential to using React effectively.
Posted on October 28, 2019
Join Our Newsletter. No Spam, Only the good stuff.
Sign up to receive the latest update from our blog.
Related
November 28, 2024
November 27, 2024