JavaScript, like any programming language, has its own set of limitations. Here are a few examples of the limitations of JavaScript:

1. Single threading: JavaScript is a single-threaded language, which means that it can only execute one task at a time. This can lead to performance issues when working with large amounts of data or when running complex calculations.

console.log("Start");

setTimeout(() => {
    console.log("Timeout 1");
}, 5000);

setTimeout(() => {
    console.log("Timeout 2");
}, 0);

console.log("End");

In this example, the "End" message is logged before the "Timeout 1" and "Timeout 2" messages, even though the second timeout has a delay of 0ms. This is because JavaScript is single-threaded and can only execute one task at a time.

2. Limited precision of numbers: JavaScript uses a double-precision floating-point format for numbers, which can lead to rounding errors and inaccuracies when working with very large or very small numbers.

let x = 0.1 + 0.2;
console.log(x); // 0.30000000000000004

In this example, the result of adding 0.1 and 0.2 is not exactly 0.3 due to the limited precision of JavaScript's floating-point numbers.

3.Limited support for multithreading: JavaScript lacks built-in support for multithreading, which can make it difficult to take full advantage of multi-core processors.

let x = 0;
let y = 0;

for(let i = 0; i < 100000000; i++) {
    x += i;
}

for(let i = 0; i < 100000000; i++) {
    y += i;
}
console.log(x + y);

In this example, the two for loops are executed sequentially, one after the other, even though they could be executed in parallel on a multi-core processor to improve performance.

4.Limited support for concurrency: JavaScript has a callback-based model for handling concurrency, which can lead to callback hell and complex nested code, making it difficult to read, understand and maintain.

function asyncFunc1(cb) {
    setTimeout(() => {
        cb(1);
    }, 1000);
}

function asyncFunc2(cb) {
    setTimeout(() => {
        cb(2);
    }, 2000);
}

function asyncFunc3(cb) {
    setTimeout(() => {
        cb(3);
    }, 3000);
}

asyncFunc1((result1) => {
    asyncFunc2((result2) => {
        asyncFunc3((result3) => {
            console.log(result1 + result2 + result3);
        });
    });
});

In this example, the three async functions are called one after the other in a nested callback pattern, which can become difficult to read and understand as more functions are added.

5.Limited support for low-level operations: JavaScript is not a low-level language and it does not provide direct access to memory, disk, or other resources, which can make it less suitable for certain types of applications, such as operating systems or device drivers.

let buffer = new ArrayBuffer(1024);
let view = new DataView(buffer);
view.setInt32(0, 256, true);
console.log(view.getInt32(0, true)); // 0

In this example, JavaScript does not provide direct access to the memory, so it's not possible to get the value stored in the buffer.

6.Lack of type safety: JavaScript is a loosely typed language and it does not have strict type checking, which can make it easier to introduce bugs and make it harder to catch them during development.

7.Limited support for Object-Oriented programming: JavaScript's prototype-based model of OOP is different from traditional class-based OOP and it can make it harder to understand and maintain OOP code.