Dan Newton
Posted on January 10, 2022
GraphQL Java is one of the most popular GraphQL server-side implementations for Java that I've found (with over 5k stars at the time of writing). If you're planning to expose a GraphQL API from a Java or JVM application, then this is an excellent library to start using.
This blog post will cover how to use GraphQL Java within a Spring application that exposes an endpoint for clients to send queries to. GraphQL Java does have its own official documentation covering this subject; however, I found it a bit too simplistic, which made it harder for me to wrap my head around it. I hope you don't think the same about the content of this post, although I guess you could write your own that is even more complicated than my examples!
I will be writing this from the assumption that you understand some of the basics of GraphQL. I won't be covering anything extremely complicated, so the basics will give you a good base for the content of this blog post. Knowing how to create a schema type and a query that does nothing fancy will be all you need. You can find this information from the official graphql.org site.
Also, here's a heads up that I have written my examples in Kotlin, although I tried to keep it friendly for Java readers.
Dependencies
Below are the Spring and GraphQL related dependencies used in this post:
<parent>
<groupId>org.springframework.boot</groupId>
<artifactId>spring-boot-starter-parent</artifactId>
<version>2.6.1</version>
</parent>
<dependencies>
<dependency>
<groupId>com.graphql-java</groupId>
<artifactId>graphql-java</artifactId>
<version>16.2</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>com.graphql-java</groupId>
<artifactId>graphql-java-spring-boot-starter-webmvc</artifactId>
<version>2.0</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.springframework.boot</groupId>
<artifactId>spring-boot-starter-web</artifactId>
<version>2.6.1</version>
</dependency>
</dependencies>
The schema we'll use
Below is the GraphQL schema that we'll use throughout this post:
type Query {
people: [Person]
peopleByFirstName(firstName: String): [Person]
personById(id: ID): Person
}
type Person {
id: ID,
firstName: String,
lastName: String
relationships: [Relationship]
}
type Relationship {
relation: Person,
relationship: String
}
I'll cover how we register and interact with the schema later on; knowing the shape of the types in the schema will set up the following sections.
Fetching data with DataFetchers
GraphQL Java uses DataFetcher
s to fetch data to include in the result of a query. More specifically, a DataFetcher
retrieves the data for a single field when a query is executed.
Every field has an assigned DataFetcher
. When an incoming GraphQL query is received, the library will call the registered DataFetcher
for each field in the query.
The official
DataFetcher
documentation can be found here.
It is worth pointing out now, as it personally caused me a lot of confusion to begin with, that a "field" can mean two things:
- The name of a query.
- A property/field in a schema type.
This is important as it means that a DataFetcher
can be linked to a query. In fact, every query must have an associated DataFetcher
. Not doing this will cause GraphQL query requests to fail as there is no entry point to begin processing the query.
I keep mentioning DataFetcher
s, but what are they really in terms of code? Below is the DataFetcher
interface:
public interface DataFetcher<T> {
T get(DataFetchingEnvironment environment) throws Exception;
}
So when I say DataFetcher
, I'm really talking about implementations of the DataFetcher
interface.
Let's look at an example DataFetcher
that will respond to the people
query:
type Query {
people: [Person]
}
The DataFetcher
for this query:
@Component
class PeopleDataFetcher(private val personRepository: PersonRepository) : DataFetcher<List<PersonDTO>> {
override fun get(environment: DataFetchingEnvironment): List<PersonDTO> {
return personRepository.findAll().map { person -> PersonDTO(
person.id,
person.firstName,
person.lastName
)
}
}
}
The PeopleDataFetcher
returns a List<PersonDTO>
to correspond to the [Person]
specified as the turn type of the GraphQL query. The PersonDTO
contains the same fields found in the Person
GraphQL type:
data class PersonDTO(val id: UUID, val firstName: String, val lastName: String)
A field for relationships has been omitted to simplify the examples
When PeopleDataFetcher.get
is executed, it queries the database, maps the results to PersonDTO
s and returns them.
When an incoming GraphQL query, like the following is received:
query {
people {
firstName
lastName
id
}
}
The following is returned after GraphQL Java has called the PeopleDataFetcher
:
{
"data": {
"people": [
{
"firstName": "John",
"lastName": "Doe",
"id": "00a0d4f2-637f-469c-9ecf-ba8839307996"
},
{
"firstName": "Dan",
"lastName": "Newton",
"id": "27a08c14-d0ad-476c-ba09-9edad3e4c8f9"
}
]
}
}
That covers a first look at what DataFetcher
s do. We'll expand on them in the following sections to improve your understanding of GraphQL Java.
The default PropertyDataFatcher
As mentioned in the previous section, every field must have an assigned DataFetcher
. That means for the Person
type:
type Person {
id: ID,
firstName: String,
lastName: String
relationships: [Relationship]
}
You would need to associate DataFetchers
to:
Person.id
Person.firstName
Person.lastName
Person.relationships
That seems a bit onerous, especially when you might be able to retrieve all of this data in one go. For example, retrieving data from a database could be the difference between 1 SQL query vs 4.
To resolve this, any field without an assigned DataFetcher
uses the PropertyDataFetcher
by default.
The PropertyDataFetcher
uses various methods (e.g. getters or keys in a map) to extract field values from the parent field (could be a query or schema type).
To provide a concrete example, the PeopleDataFetcher
we saw previously was used to respond to the people
GraphQL query (the query, type and PeopleDataFetcher
are included below):
type Query {
people: [Person]
}
type Person {
id: ID,
firstName: String,
lastName: String
relationships: [Relationship]
}
@Component
class PeopleDataFetcher(private val personRepository: PersonRepository) : DataFetcher<List<PersonDTO>> {
override fun get(environment: DataFetchingEnvironment): List<PersonDTO> {
return personRepository.findAll().map { person -> PersonDTO(
person.id,
person.firstName,
person.lastName
)
}
}
}
The PeopleDataFetcher
returns a PersonDTO
for each Person
it finds to respond to the top-level query. This can be thought of as the "parent field".
The GraphQL library will then move down to fetch values for each queried field in Person
, for example, firstName
and lastName
. Using the PropertyDataFetcher
, it accesses each PersonDTO
returned by the parent field's DataFetcher
(PeopleDataFetcher
) and extracts the values using their getters.
In concrete terms, this means:
-
Person.id
-> Value provided byPersonDTO.id
. -
Person.firstName
-> Value provided byPersonDTO.firstName
. -
Person.lastName
-> Value provided byPersonDTO.lastName
. -
Person.relationships
-> Empty because no value was provided.
PersonDTO.id
is how you writePerson.getId
in Kotlin (the applies to the other fields).
You might need to run that through your head a few times so it makes sense. I only properly understood this after debugging the library when my code wasn't working correctly.
Writing a DataFetcher for a schema type's field
The PeopleDataFetcher
we've seen throughout this post responds to a query. Now let's look at a custom DataFetcher
that should be associated with a schema type's field.
The PersonRelationshipsDataFetcher
fetches data for the Person.relationships
field:
@Component
class PersonRelationshipsDataFetcher(
private val relationshipRepository: RelationshipRepository
) : DataFetcher<List<RelationshipDTO>> {
override fun get(environment: DataFetchingEnvironment): List<RelationshipDTO> {
// Gets the object wrapping the [relationships] field
// In this case a [PersonDTO] object.
val source = environment.getSource<PersonDTO>()
return relationshipRepository.findAllByPersonId(source.id).map { relationship ->
RelationshipDTO(
relation = relationship.relatedPerson.toDTO(),
relationship = relationship.relationship
)
}
}
}
It looks similar to the PeopleDataFetcher
we saw previously, except for the new call to DataFetchingEnvironment.getSource
. This method allows a DataFetcher
to access the object returned by the DataFetcher
associated with the parent field. After accessing this object, information is extracted from it (PersonDTO.id
) to be used in the SQL query executed by the PersonRelationshipsDataFetcher
.
Writing a DataFetcher for a query containing an argument
Queries become far more worthwhile when you can pass arguments into them.
Take the query:
type Query {
peopleByFirstName(firstName: String): [Person]
}
To handle this you'd want a DataFetcher
like the one below:
@Component
class PeopleByFirstNameDataFetcher(private val personRepository: PersonRepository) : DataFetcher<List<PersonDTO>> {
override fun get(environment: DataFetchingEnvironment): List<PersonDTO> {
// The argument is extracted from the GraphQL query
val firstName = environment.getArgument<String>("firstName")
return personRepository.findAllByFirstName(firstName)
.map { person -> PersonDTO(person.id, person.firstName, person.lastName) }
}
}
The important method call here is to DataFetchingEnvironment.getArgument
, which does as it says and extracts an argument from the incoming GraphQL query. Handily, getArgument
allows you to specify the type the argument should be (so you don't have to convert it yourself).
DataFetchingEnvironment
also contains other methods regarding arguments, e.g.getArguments
andcontainsArgument
.
Setting up a GraphQL instance
You've seen how to write a few DataFetcher
s by this point; we now need to tie everything together by creating a GraphQL
instance and registering an application's DataFetcher
s.
The @Configuration
code below does just that:
@Configuration
class GraphQLConfiguration(
private val peopleByFirstNameDataFetcher: PeopleByFirstNameDataFetcher,
private val peopleDataFetcher: PeopleDataFetcher,
private val personByIdDataFetcher: PersonByIdDataFetcher,
private val personRelationshipsDataFetcher: PersonRelationshipsDataFetcher
) {
@Bean
fun graphQL(): GraphQL {
val typeRegistry: TypeDefinitionRegistry = SchemaParser().parse(readSchema())
val runtimeWiring: RuntimeWiring = buildWiring()
val graphQLSchema: GraphQLSchema = SchemaGenerator().makeExecutableSchema(typeRegistry, runtimeWiring)
return GraphQL.newGraphQL(graphQLSchema).build()
}
private fun schemaFile(): File {
return this::class.java.classLoader.getResource("schema.graphqls")
?.let { url -> File(url.toURI()) }
?: throw IllegalStateException("The resource does not exist")
}
private fun buildWiring(): RuntimeWiring {
return RuntimeWiring.newRuntimeWiring()
.type(newTypeWiring("Query").dataFetcher("peopleByFirstName", peopleByFirstNameDataFetcher))
.type(newTypeWiring("Query").dataFetcher("people", peopleDataFetcher))
.type(newTypeWiring("Query").dataFetcher("personById", personByIdDataFetcher))
.type(newTypeWiring("Person").dataFetcher("relationships", personRelationshipsDataFetcher))
.build()
}
}
The purpose of this @Configuration
class is to create a GraphQL
instance that GraphQL Java uses. Further setup is not required as it will be picked up by Spring Boot's auto-configuration.
The first step of creating the GraphQL
instance requires reading the application's GraphQL schema. SchemaParser.parse
can take in File
s, InputStream
s, Reader
s or String
s, which it parses (as the class name suggests) and returns a TypeDefinitionRegistry
to be used later. In this application, the schema is defined in a resource file which gets fed into SchemaParser.parse
. This is what allows the GraphQL library to understand incoming queries and what can or cannot be handled.
The DataFetcher
s are then registered with a RuntimeWiring
instance (through a RuntimeWiring.Builder
returned by RuntimeWiring.newRuntimeWiring
). Every time I mentioned "gets the DataFetcher
associated to the field", this is where the association actually happens. I can stop hand waving all the time now since you've seen the code.
Each DataFetcher
in this example application is injected into the configuration class and linked to the RuntimeWiring
instance through its type
method. Each TypeRuntimeWiring.Builder
instance (returned by newTypeWiring
) requires 3 fundamental inputs:
- The name of the schema type (
"Query"
or a type name). - The name of the field (query name or schema type field).
- The
DataFetcher
associated with the type and field.
After registering each DataFetcher
, the RuntimeWiring
instance is finalised using build
.
Finally, the TypeDefinitionRegistry
and RuntimeWiring
created previously are passed through a SchemaGenerator
and then into GraphQL.newGraphQL
to retrieve a fully functional GraphQL
instance.
Sending a GraphQL query to the application
With the setup complete, the application now exposes a /graphql
endpoint provided by the auto-configured code in graphql-java-spring-boot-starter-webmvc
. This endpoint is where clients will send GraphQL queries to.
In this section, we'll look at how to send a query using cURL and Postman (which has GraphQL functionality) and view the returned data.
The query we are trying to send:
query {
peopleByFirstName(firstName: "Dan") {
firstName
lastName
id
relationships {
relation {
firstName
lastName
}
relationship
}
}
}
- cURL:
curl 'localhost:8080/graphql/' \
-X POST \
-H 'content-type: application/json' \
--data '{ "query": "query { peopleByFirstName(firstName: \"Dan\") { firstName lastName id relationships { relation { firstName lastName } relationship }}}"}'
- Postman:
Both of these methods return the same data (I would be worried if they didn't):
{
"data": {
"peopleByFirstName": [
{
"firstName": "Dan",
"lastName": "Newton",
"id": "27a08c14-d0ad-476c-ba09-9edad3e4c8f9",
"relationships": [
{
"relation": {
"firstName": "Laura",
"lastName": "So"
},
"relationship": "Wife"
},
{
"relation": {
"firstName": "Random",
"lastName": "Person"
},
"relationship": "Friend"
}
]
},
{
"firstName": "Dan",
"lastName": "Doe",
"id": "3c07b717-8b9c-4d88-926f-c892be38ee85",
"relationships": []
},
]
}
}
The most crucial factor here is that a POST
request is used. It seems standard for GraphQL APIs to use POST
requests for both fetching and mutating data. This threw me off for a while, as the error I received from the /graphql
endpoint didn't cause me to believe it was due to using the wrong HTTP verb.
For clarity, using the wrong HTTP verb (e.g. a GET
) through Postman leads to the following response and logline:
{
"timestamp": "2022-01-03T16:50:58.376+00:00",
"status": 400,
"error": "Bad Request",
"path": "/graphql"
}
Resolved [org.springframework.web.bind.MissingServletRequestParameterException: Required request parameter 'query' for method parameter type String is not present]
Improving the registration of DataFetchers
The registration of DataFetcher
s could be improved as they are currently registered by injecting every DataFetcher
by name into the GraphQLConfiguration
class and manually associating each with a type and field name. This isn't too bad right now since the application is small; if you argued that it already looks dodgy, then I'd agree with you.
To make the code more maintainable and extensible moving forward, we can introduce a new structure for defining DataFetcher
s and registering them.
We can achieve this by defining a new interface that specifies the type and field name a DataFetcher
should be linked to:
/**
* [TypedDataFetcher] is an instance of a [DataFetcher] that specifies the schema type
* and field it processes.
*
* Instances of [TypedDataFetcher] are registered into an instance of [RuntimeWiring]
* after being picked up by Spring (the instances must be annotated with @[Component]
* or a similar annotated to be injected).
*/
interface TypedDataFetcher<T> : DataFetcher<T> {
/**
* The type that the [TypedDataFetcher] handles.
*
* Use `Query` if the [TypedDataFetcher] responds to incoming queries.
*
* Use a schema type name if the [TypedDataFetcher] fetches data for a single field
* in the specified type.
*/
val typeName: String
/**
* The field that the [TypedDataFetcher] should apply to.
*
* If the [typeName] is `Query`, then [fieldName] will be the name of the query the
* TypedDataFetcher] handles.
*
* If the [typeName] is a schema type, then [fieldName] should be the name of a single
* field in [typeName].
*/
val fieldName: String
}
By using TypedDataFetcher
, you can retrieve all its implementations as Spring allows injecting of List
s containing all instances implementing an interface.
Combining this interface with modifications to the DataFetcher
registration code in GraphQLConfiguration
brings it all together:
@Configuration
class GraphQLConfiguration(private val dataFetchers: List<TypedDataFetcher<*>>) {
// Create the GraphQL instance (no changes from the previous example).
/**
* Loops through all injected [TypedDataFetcher] instances and includes them in the output [RuntimeWiring] instance.
*/
private fun buildWiring(): RuntimeWiring {
val wiring = RuntimeWiring.newRuntimeWiring()
for (dataFetcher in dataFetchers) {
wiring.type(newTypeWiring(dataFetcher.typeName).dataFetcher(dataFetcher.fieldName, dataFetcher))
}
return wiring.build()
}
}
The registration now uses the typeName
and fieldName
provided by each TypedDataFetcher
, breaking the rigid link between DataFetcher
implementations and the types, fields or queries they represent. Adding new TypedDataFetcher
s becomes straightforward after making this alteration; you create a new implementation, define the typeName
and fieldName
, annotate with it @Component
, and the rest is handled for you.
Summary
GraphQL Java lets you do what the name suggests, support GraphQL queries within Java (or other JVM languages).
It does this through associating DataFetcher
s to types and fields that you write and pointing incoming queries their way. With the library handling the parsing of queries, it frees you to focus on implementing the DataFetcher
s that contain your application's primary functionality.
I'd love to try and summarise how to use GraphQL Java further; however, I already struggled to write the post in the most coherent way as possible; there is no way I could condense it to a few sentences.
Anyway, the end!
Posted on January 10, 2022
Join Our Newsletter. No Spam, Only the good stuff.
Sign up to receive the latest update from our blog.