Why does `2.toString()` break but `2..toString()` works?

gnclmorais

Gonçalo Morais

Posted on August 31, 2020

Why does `2.toString()` break but `2..toString()` works?
> 2.toString()
Uncaught SyntaxError: Invalid or unexpected token
> 2..toString()
"2"
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

The reason 2.toString() doesn’t work in JavaScript but 2..toString() works is something I always found puzzling but never got to the bottom of it… until now, when I found myself with some free time and this question back in my mind.

The explanation for this quirky behaviour seems to be connected with the JavaScript parser, which acts in a greedy way, i.e., it tries to match the longest valid operator each time. In this case, as it parses and evaluates character by character, when it reads the number 2 it expects to be parsing a number, so 2 is valid. The next character, ., is also valid in a number (decimal number, but still, valid). Now the following character, t, is not valid in a number, so an error is thrown:

Uncaught SyntaxError: Invalid or unexpected token.

In the second case, 2..toString(), it processes everything the same way but, when it runs into the second dot, it knows it cannot be a number since it found one dot before, the decimal separator. So the number it has so far (2.) gets converted to a Number (2.0 which is 2) and them toString is called on it, finally returning "2". A simple way to allow a toString() invocation on a number would be to wrap that number with parentheses, clearly encapsulating the number evaluation: (2).toString().

Basilly, 2..toString() is the same as having 2.0.toString():

> 2..toString()
"2"
> 2.0.toString()
"2"
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Resources

💖 💪 🙅 🚩
gnclmorais
Gonçalo Morais

Posted on August 31, 2020

Join Our Newsletter. No Spam, Only the good stuff.

Sign up to receive the latest update from our blog.

Related