This is part 1 of the "Building 3via" series where we'll be creating a full stack MERN application for creating tactical quizes. [The final code is here.](https://github.com/ZdravkoKirilov/3via-ui) [Part 2 of the series is here](https://dev.to/zdravkokirilov/monorepo-code-sharing-with-the-mern-stack-3via-series-part-2-3dbj) [Live demo](https://zdravkokirilov.github.io/3via-ui/) ### Intro As a React developer I often find myself wondering if a component has grown too big and needs to be refactored. I started my career in times when the way of thinking about UIs was a bit different and readjusting your mindset to React took a bit of an effort, [which is still reflected even in the official docs](https://react.dev/learn/thinking-in-react). When a person is switching to React I've often seen a natural progression of 2 extremes: - Trying to apply your prior vanilla/jQuery habits right into React's territory, but without thinking in components: ```jsx export const GonnaPutTheWholePageHere = () => { ... return (

...soup of tags with classes

} ``` - After getting a bit more used to React you start seeing components everywhere and initially it's pretty exciting - you start to reap the true benefits of component-based libraries and sometimes this might lead to another kind of madness: ```jsx export const MuchFancySoReact = (props) => { return

{props.children}

} ``` Having passed through both of the above stages, I take a more pragmatic approach nowadays. Whenever I get into a technical discussion about how big components should be I would usually share [Kent C. Dodds's article](https://kentcdodds.com/blog/when-to-break-up-a-component-into-multiple-components). As with most things we end up in the subjective land of "it depends". I would like to show a practical example from my own experience building heavy CRUD UIs with React and how I try to keep things tidy. ### Prerequisites - Some prior knowledge of React and concepts like [custom hooks](https://react.dev/learn/reusing-logic-with-custom-hooks) - Basic knowledge of popular libraries in the React ecosystem like [react-query](https://tanstack.com/query/latest/), [react-hook-form](https://react-hook-form.com/), [MUI](https://mui.com/) ### The problem ![Trivia building project](https://dev-to-uploads.s3.amazonaws.com/uploads/articles/k2cyorcg00tlnrd6f5q9.png) It's a UI for building trivia game configurations where we can add questions and answers with their respective points. It is a quite packed user interface with lots of user actions: - create / delete / edit / reorder Questions - create / delete / reorder Answers All those actions trigger async requests ( in our case it's all mocked for simplicity ) and need to have proper feedback informing us whether the operation succeeded. Those tend to pollute component code pretty fast. If I follow my personal rule of letting a component grow until it becomes obvious we need to break it down, I would end up with something like this: ```jsx const InitialQuizForm: FC = () => { const [visibleCreateForm, toggleCreateForm] = useState(false); ... 5 more hooks for the other operations flags const handleAddQuestion = (dto: CreateQuestionDto) => { addQuestion.mutate(dto, { onSuccess: () => { toggleCreateForm(false); }, }); }; ... 5 more of those "handle*Something" functions which are doing API requests return ( ...rendering the list of questions... ... 5 more dialogs for the other operations /* feedback for the "reorder questions" operation */ Questions updated. ); }; ``` I've shortened a lot of the repeating stuff for the sake of readability, but you could check out [the original file](https://github.com/ZdravkoKirilov/3via-ui/tree/main/src/before/index.tsx) - it packs more than 500 lines of very similarly repeating code for each possible user action: - Form/Confirmation toggling flag: ```jsx const [visibleCreateForm, toggleCreateForm] = useState(false); ``` - A handler that executes a mutation ( usually - a network request ) ```jsx const handleAddQuestion = (dto: CreateQuestionDto) => { addQuestion.mutate(dto, { onSuccess: () => { toggleCreateForm(false); }, }); }; ``` - Some form UI, in our case - presented in a modal: ```jsx ``` ![Create question form](https://dev-to-uploads.s3.amazonaws.com/uploads/articles/fj94rvg9uf8lmndzy19t.png) ### The solution Custom hooks are usually associated and used for extracting state and logic but in practice nothing stops us from returning even JSX. We could easily combine the above 3 repeating aspects into a single hook, which: 1) takes care of it's own UI toggling logic 2) takes care of mutations after a form is submitted 3) renders the form Here's an example with the "create new question" operation turned into an almighty hook: ```jsx // useCreateQuestion.tsx export const useCreateQuestion = () => { ... const [visibleCreateForm, toggleCreateForm] = useState(false); const handleAddQuestion = (dto: CreateQuestionDto) => { addQuestion.mutate(dto, { onSuccess: () => { toggleCreateForm(false); }, }); }; return { createQuestion: () => toggleCreateForm(true), CreateQuestionUI: ( ), }; }; ``` And then in the main component we have a trigger and UI returned from the hook that we can use: ```jsx export const RefinedQuizForm= () => { ... const { createQuestion, CreateQuestionUI } = useCreateQuestion(); return ( ... Questions Add .... {CreateQuestionUI} .... ); } ``` We just got rid of: 1. Dealing with rendering the form UI 2. Dealing with UI toggling flags 3. Dealing with the actual request and its feedback It's all encapsulated in the hook itself. The monster component eventually [slims down to](https://github.com/ZdravkoKirilov/3via-ui/blob/main/src/after/index.tsx) a bunch of hooks doing the CRUD heavy lifting and rendering the list of Questions ```jsx const RefinedQuizForm: FC = () => { const { query, editQuestion } = useQuestions(); const { createQuestion, CreateQuestionUI } = useCreateQuestion(); const { editQuestion: showEditForm, EditQuestionUI } = useEditQuestion(); const { deleteQuestion, DeleteQuestionUI } = useDeleteQuestion(); const { showAnswerForm, CreateAnswerUI } = useCreateAnswer(); const { deleteAnswer, DeleteAnswerUI, answerToDelete } = useDeleteAnswer(); const { moveQuestion, FeedbackUI: SaveQuestionsFeedbackUI, isUpdatingQuestions, } = useMoveQuestion(query.data || []); const { moveAnswer, activeQuestion, FeedbackUI: MoveAnswerFeedbackUI, } = useMoveAnswer(); return ( .... .... {questions.map((question, questionIndex) => ( ... ))} {CreateQuestionUI} {EditQuestionUI} {DeleteQuestionUI} {CreateAnswerUI} {DeleteAnswerUI} {SaveQuestionsFeedbackUI} {MoveAnswerFeedbackUI} ); }; export default RefinedQuizForm; ``` ### Other improvements Well there's an obvious one that probably wouldn't surprise anyone: **create a separate component for each rendered Question in the list** to reduce the inline markup we have in the main component. Extracting list items to new component files is among the things I stopped doing automatically without thinking. It's wiser to first consider the pros and cons, because there is always some of both. If it's just a few lines of markup it might not be worth it creating a new component, because we have to define Props and pass them + we can't scan the underlying UI at a glance. In this particular case though the Question markup is getting big and complicated, with a lot of buttons. Each one has its own list inside as well where all the Answers are rendered. It wouldn't be unrealistic to expect that one day a product person comes along saying we should implement drag and drop, which brings even more overhead. ... which leads us to the next change: ```jsx const RefinedQuizForm: FC = () => { ... return ( ... ... {questions.map((question, questionIndex) => ( showEditForm(question)} onDelete={() => deleteQuestion(question.id)} ... onMoveQuestion={(direction) => moveQuestion(direction, questionIndex) } onMoveAnswer={(direction, answerIndex) => moveAnswer(direction, answerIndex, question) } /> ))} ... ); }; export default RefinedQuizForm; ``` There are a lot of props being passed there and it certainly doesn't feel perfect, but it's a conscious tradeoff. One small detail that I like is that callbacks like "onEdit" and "onDelete" are quite blank from the "Question" component's perspective: ```ts // Question.tsx type Props = { question: Question; ... onEdit: () => void; onDelete: () => void; ... }; ``` They don't need to pass back the "question" object as a param, because it's already available in the upper scope, thus relieving the component's API a little. ### Final words The way that noise and entropy gradually built up in a component has been bothering me for a long time, especially the parts where I handle more and more modals, confirmations, snackbars and all the creeping "useState" flags associated with them. The "hook of all trades" technique has really helped me clean things up and hide that kind of stuff under proper abstractions to the point where I actually like going back to my components even after a few months have passed. What we used here was a simplified excerpt from my dear personal project of creating tactically based, competitive trivia games where knowing the right answers might not always be enough. Stay tuned for upcoming posts from the same series where I'll expand that very same codebase with topics like: 1. How I handle Nest BE and React FE in a monorepo environment and how we can share code and types between them. Why I no more throw Errors and what we can do instead. 2. A simple and elegant decorator-based authorization system in Nest. 3. Why I prefer ( if I have to pick just one ) FE integration testing over unit and some API mocking techniques. 4. Why I don't directly use primitive typescript types like "string" and "number" and what can be done instead to make things stricter. How nice a library like zod plays along with that. Thanks for coming so far, I hope it was worth the time.

zdravkokirilov

The "hook of all trades" in React [3via series part 1]

Join Our Newsletter. No Spam, Only the good stuff.