Introduction

In the part 11 of our series we measured the cold starts of the Lambda function with Corretto Java 21 runtime without SnapStart enabled, with SnapStart enabled and also applied DynamoDB invocation priming optimization with different deployment packages/jar sizes between 137KB and 50MB. In this article we will measure the cold starts but will use different memory settings.

Measuring cold starts with Java 21 with and without SnapStart enabled using different Lambda memory settings.

In our experiment we'll re-use the application introduced in part 9 for this. Here is the code for the sample application. There are basically 2 Lambda functions which both respond to the API Gateway requests and retrieve product by id received from the Api Gateway from DynamoDB. One Lambda function GetProductByIdWithPureJava21Lambda can be used with and without SnapStart and the second one GetProductByIdWithPureJava21LambdaAndPriming uses SnapStart and DynamoDB request invocation priming. We'll measure cold starts using the following memory settings in MBs : 256, 512, 768, 1024, 1536 and 2048.

The results of the experiment below were based on reproducing approximately 100 cold starts for the duration of our experiment which ran for approximately 1 hour. For it (and all experiments from my previous articles) I used the load test tool hey, but you can use whatever tool you want, like Serverless-artillery or Postman

Cold start time without SnapStart in ms:

Let's put this data into graph:

Cold start time with SnapStart without Priming in ms :

Let's put this data into graph:

Cold start time with SnapStart enabled and with DynamoDB invocation Priming in ms :

Let's put this data into graph as well:

I also measured the deployment time of such sample project with all memory settings mentioned above with SnapStart enabled for all functions and GetProductByIdWithPureJava21LambdaAndPriming function additionally using priming. Here are the results:

Conclusions

In this article we measured the cold start time of the Lambda function without SnapStart with SnapStart and for the latter with additional priming of DynamoDB invocation.

In case of not enabling SnapStart we observed that increasing the memory from 256 MB to 2048 MB constantly brought significant reduction of the cold start time.

In case of enabling of SnapStart but not using priming we observed that increasing the from 256 MB to 1024 MB brought significant reduction of the cold start time but after that the impact of increasing the memory to 1536 MB or even to 2048 MB varied depending on percentile and being significant until p90 and much lower for the percentiles higher than 90.

In case of enabling of SnapStart and with additional priming of DynamoDB invocation we observed that increasing the from 256 MB to 1024 MB brought significant reduction of the cold start time but after that the impact of increasing the memory to 1536 MB or 2048 MB was low for all percentiles.

So for the SnapStart-enabled Lambda function and considering our use case with Lambda function reading from the DynamoDB table the Lambda memory setting of 1024 MB is a good choice.

Deployment time for the SnapStart enabled on all 3 Lambda functions and additionally applying priming on one of them also became lower by giving the Lambda function more memory.

In the next article I will also provide measurements for the warm execution times for exact this use case, as using different memory settings not only affect the cold start times but also the warm execution times and therefore Lambda costs. Stay tuned!