Arepl stats for 2018

almenon

Almenon

Posted on March 16, 2019

Arepl stats for 2018

See last post for june here

Q: How many people use AREPL now?

Around 40 a week. This has increased significantly from last time, largely due to increased SEO by altering my title. Just a two-word change to my title (AREPL for python) caused the popularity to skyrocket. In fact, AREPL is now the #2 extension when searching for python.

Q: What nationality are the users?

This is a lot more diverse than last graph! Seriously, read my last post and the difference is insane. US has gone from being the majority of the users to a small minority, and not even the largest minority at that. China and UK are both expected presences — but Brazil beating India and Japan really suprised me. That might be a outlier — brazil useage has gone down in 2019. I haven’t heard of brazillians having a big tech sector but brazillians feel free to correct me!

Looking at this graph makes me realize how US-centric I am. In retrospect, US being the minority is obvious. Also, special shout-out to the one user in Syria! Civil war ain’t gonna stop you from programming!

Q: How often does a person use AREPL each week?

for July, August, and September:

Heavy users: 32 (1%) have used it ten or more times. This is about once a week or more.

Light users: 227 (60%) have used it two to ten times. That’s a couple times a month at most.

Once only users: 121(32%) have used it only once.

The 1% conversion rate from newcomers to heavy users could definitely be improved. It’s not terrible — google drive only has a .5% conversion rate from free → paid users, for example. But compare that with spotify, and you can see that I have a lot of catching up to do.

image from https://www.process.st/freemium-conversion-rate/

AREPL in 2018 was still very buggy — I’m hoping to see a rise in % heavy users with my bugfixes in 2019.

Q: Has the error telemetry been helpful so far?

Yes! The telemetry recorded a spike in the number of errors (specifically, people with the wrong python path configured) when I did one of my releases. Unfortunately, I thought this was due to the overall increased usage. It turned out that the mac version was broken due to a casing bug. After I fixed that the number of errors went down.

Q: Any new telemetry logging?

I’m now logging settings so I can if people actually use the settings I offer. For the most part, no. I see that printResultPlacement, showFooter, and whenToExecute are sometimes changed but that’s about it. The only setting that gets frequently changed is python path — but that’s to be expected.

Some final notes:

Q: Where do I install AREPL?
A: https://github.com/Almenon/AREPL-vscode

Q: How can I add application insights to my own extension?
https://medium.com/@almenon214/adding-telemetry-to-your-vscode-extension-f3d52d2e573c

💖 💪 🙅 🚩
almenon
Almenon

Posted on March 16, 2019

Join Our Newsletter. No Spam, Only the good stuff.

Sign up to receive the latest update from our blog.

Related

Arepl stats for 2018
stats Arepl stats for 2018

March 16, 2019